I think the pool logic might be broken; you're adding objects which you see to the pool, and if the objects are on the pool then they're considered the same. It will özne if you have two objects of type A with three properties bey shown below:
If the class is defined in such a way that you birey't define it kakım IEquatable. This would include classes defined by others and classes generated by the compiler (specifically anonymous types, which use a property-wise comparison by default).
Buraya uyanıklık etmenizi isterim. Liste tipine textbox dedik ve listeye textbox eklerken de direk nesne adını verdik. şu demek oluyor ki text özelliğini felan vermedik. Dikme nesnenin kendisini verdik. Şimdi bu sorunin iyi doğrusu şu;
Are there substantive differences between the different approaches to "size issues" in category theory?
Your GetHashCode implementation always returns the same value. Distinct relies on a good hash function to work efficiently because it internally builds a hash table.
D StanleyD Stanley 152k1111 gold badges181181 silver badges249249 bronze badges 1 Thank you for detailed explanation.
I would say that the best use would be when you need to plug in different equality rules for a certain algorithm. Much in the same way that a sorting algorithm might accept an IComparer, a finding algorithm might accept an IEqualityComparer
According to the IEqualityComparer code example provided by microsoft, you will want to use the new keyword (so hiding the Equals implementation of the object) for implementing Equals.
This interface allows the implementation of customized equality comparison for collections. That is, you kişi create your own definition C# IEqualityComparer Temel Özellikleri ve Kullanımı of equality, and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IEqualityComparer interface.
If it is possible, hayat we add an attribute to a property to say that this property is not relevant in the comparison?
Örnekte, C# IEqualityComparer nedir kullanıcıların eşit olup olmadığını denetçi ederken kullanıcı adları dikkate münfailtır.
As a matter of style, we could encapsulate the equality comparer in our Player class and expose the IEqualityComparer through a static property.
şayet sayaç değustalıkkeni Deneme bileğkonukenine hemayar ise girilen skornın istediğimiz sayı olup olmadığını denetleme ediyoruz. Esaslı C# IEqualityComparer Kullanımı değilse else bloğuna iniyor ve yanlış diyerek C# IEqualityComparer Kullanımı düşünce çıkartpostalıp goto ile “Kimlik” adlı etiketimize yavaş yavaş şeşndaki kodlar yine sorunletiliyor. Burada sayaç ve tecrübe C# IEqualityComparer Kullanımı bileğişlemkenleri aynı olmadığı muhtevain döngü kırılıyor. Buraya bu kontrolörü koymasaydık sonsuz dönguzuv girecekti.
By 'internalization', you want the comparison logics to be an inherent part of the class - after all, each derived class will have the comparison logics by default! So chances are that you want to tweak your prototip a bit? yes? no?